Some of the best work being created in figurative painting today is the result of an intensive, systematic, well-planned course of study that could be defined as “academic”.
|One of many lithographic prints created by Charles Brague in conjunction with Jean Gerome . These plates were copied by beginning academy art students.|
For most of the 20th century “academic” was a dirty word. It represented old-school rules, blind followers of the past, resistance to new ideas, labored, formula driven, boring, artificial work with an insistence on a doctrinaire, systematic aesthetic…all a result of academy (art school) training.
|Raphael – The School of Athens - 1509 – Fresco|
Academies of art have a long tradition. The word itself derives its name from the place near the Acropolis where Plato and his friends met to talk about philosophy. This was the original Grove of Academe and the men who walked under its trees were known as the Academy of Plato.
The word was revived in Renaissance Florence by the Neo-Platonists. The first art academy was probably founded by Vasari in 1563.
|Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres - Madame Henri Gouse – 28.74″x 24.41″ – Oil – 1845-52|
|Jacques-Louis David – The Death of Socrates - 51″x 77.25″ – Oil – 1787|
“Being intellectual, art should be systematic, the Academicians reasoned; it should be divisible into logical categories and a hierarchy of modes. An order of rank was established with history painting at the top and still-life at the bottom of the ladder. And each aspect of art was studied, separated into its components, analyzed. Artists were taught to draw the parts of the body before they approached the whole figure. They studied the hand, the foot, the mouth, the anatomy of the horse bone by bone and muscle by muscle”.
|Example of plaster cast|
This type of teaching was the norm well into the 1800′s, but political turmoil, growing individualism, protests against authority, increasing assertiveness of the masses, even the rise of Impressionism all contributed to the dramatic change in the way artists were trained during the 1900′s.
|Alexandre Cabanel - Cleopatra Testing Poisons on Condemned Prisoners - Oil – 1887
|Sir Lawrence Alma Tadema – The Finding of Moses - 54.13″x 84″ – Oil – 1904
|Jean-Leon Gerome – The Reception of the Siamese Ambassadors at Fontainebleau - 50.39″x 102.36″ – Oil – 1864|
R.H. Ives Gammell in his book, Twilight of Painting discusses some of the characteristics of the academic tradition.
- Strives to convey a sense of the high import of its subject matter
- Preeminence of historical painting. This sort of painting set out to illustrate narratives presenting man in his heroic aspects, choosing by preference incidents typifying the ever recurring patterns that govern human conduct from age to age. Subjects were usually drawn from the Bible, Greek or Roman literature, or allegory.
- Insistence upon extraordinary draftsmanship.
- A thorough knowledge of human anatomy and applied perspective as well as a very broad knowledge of general culture, including history, architecture, and costumes.
- Strong emphasis on principles of composition.
- Drawing of the idealized, generalized types rather than specific characteristics.
- Emphasis upon form rather than color.
- Workmanship unobtrusive by its very perfection.
|Charles Brague – La Sentinelle – 11.02″x 8.27″ – Oil – 1876
|William Adolphe Bouguereau – Calinerie - 57.09″x 35.83″ – Oil – 1890|
Today, with an increased interest in reviving some aspects of the academic traditions, many academies of art have blossomed around the world.
|Two points are represented here: drawing from the plaster cast and drawing the image the same size as viewed using the sight-size method.|
(Color progression through monochromatic, limited palette, full palette)
Images: Art Renewal Center
The Florence Academy of Art
Academy of Classical Design
Quotes: The Academy - Art New Annual XXXIII
Reference: R.H. Ives Gammell – Twilight of Painting
If you would like to receive my monthly newsletter, please click HERE.
Coming next week, an interview with Andy Thomas